CARDIOLOGY · CPT 92930

CPT 92930: Coronary Stent Placement, Two or More Lesions or a Bifurcation

Interventional cardiology cluster · Last updated September 2026

CPT 92930 is the new 2026 code for complex coronary stenting: two or more distinct lesions in the same major artery, or a bifurcation treated in both the main vessel and the side branch. The common error is over-using it, not missing it, because several stents in one long lesion is still 92928.

What CPT 92930 covers

92930 is percutaneous transcatheter placement of intracoronary stent(s), with coronary angioplasty when performed, in a single major artery and/or its branches, for two or more distinct coronary lesions with two or more coronary stents deployed in two or more coronary segments, or a bifurcation lesion requiring angioplasty and/or stenting in both the main artery and the side branch.

It exists to separate complex stenting from the standard case. 92928 now reports stenting of a single lesion regardless of the number of stents or coronary segments involved. 92930 is the code when the work is genuinely more than one lesion, or a bifurcation treated in both limbs.

Vessel rules and modifiers

PCI codes are reported per major coronary artery, and the vessel has to be identified on the claim:

  • LD: left anterior descending.
  • LC: left circumflex.
  • RC: right coronary.
  • LM: left main.
  • RI: ramus intermedius.

One base code per major vessel treated. A second major vessel takes its own base code with its own vessel modifier. Branches within the same major vessel are now part of the base code rather than a separate line. CPT counts up to two branches of the left anterior descending (diagonals), left circumflex (marginals) and right (posterior descending, posterolaterals); the left main and ramus intermedius have none.

Work in a native coronary artery can be reported separately from work performed through a bypass graft, and work on separate lesions in different major arteries is separately reportable.

Where more than one intervention type is performed in the same vessel, report the single most intensive service for that vessel rather than stacking codes. Where a single lesion bridges two vessels but is treated with one intervention, only one code is reported.

The wider family beyond these four: 92924 atherectomy without a stent, 92937 revascularization of or through a bypass graft, 92943 and 92945 for chronic total occlusions.

Reimbursement context

The PCI codes were restructured for 2026, so figures quoted from earlier years no longer apply.

Medicare pays for this code under the Physician Fee Schedule, and the amount depends on where you practise. Each code carries relative value units for physician work, practice expense and malpractice, each adjusted by a geographic practice cost index (GPCI) for the locality, and the total is multiplied by the conversion factor:

(work RVU × work GPCI + practice expense RVU × PE GPCI + malpractice RVU × MP GPCI) × conversion factor

For 2026 the conversion factor is $33.4009 for practitioners who are not qualifying APM participants and $33.5675 for qualifying APM participants, as set in the CY 2026 Physician Fee Schedule final rule (CMS-1832-F; see the CMS fact sheet). Because the RVUs differ by code and the GPCIs differ by locality, what your practice is paid will differ from any national average. Pull the RVUs and the payment for your own locality from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool.

Documentation requirements

  • The vessel treated, named specifically, and every branch involved.
  • The coronary segment(s) treated, per the 29-segment model CPT adopted for 2026. Segment-level detail is what separates one lesion from two, and therefore 92928 from 92930.
  • Lesion location, length and percentage stenosis before and after, and the number of stents deployed.
  • Devices used, including stent type, size and number.
  • The clinical indication for intervention, including ischemia evidence where required by payer policy.
  • Whether a diagnostic study preceded the intervention in the same session, and if so, why it was necessary and not already available.
  • Contrast volume, fluoroscopy time and any complications.
  • A signed procedure note naming each intervention performed per vessel.

Common denials and the exact fix

Several stents in one lesion billed as 92930

The most likely 92930 error. CPT defines a lesion as running from the proximal end of the target lesion to its distal end, and a single lesion may span several coronary segments. Two or three stents in one long lesion is still one lesion.

Fix: report 92928, which covers a single lesion regardless of the number of stents or segments. Reserve 92930 for two or more distinct lesions with two or more stents in two or more segments, or a bifurcation treated in both the main artery and the side branch.

Complex case under-reported as 92928

The inverse error, and it pays on submission, which is why it persists. A bifurcation treated with angioplasty and/or stenting in both limbs, or a second distinct lesion stented in another segment, is more than 92928 describes.

Fix: route bifurcation and multi-lesion cases through a coding check that reads the procedure note for lesion boundaries and the work done in each limb.

Deleted add-on billed for the side branch

92929, the old add-on for each additional branch, was deleted for 2026. Branch work within the same major artery is part of the base code.

Fix: remove the line. A bifurcation is captured by 92930 itself, not by a branch add-on.

92928 and 92930 both billed for the same artery

All work in a major coronary artery and/or its branches is reported with a single code, coded to the highest-level intervention.

Fix: one base code per major artery. A different major artery treated in the same session takes its own base code with its own vessel modifier.

Distinct lesions not documented as distinct

The code turns on lesion count, and the claim cannot show that. A note that lists stents without saying where each lesion starts and ends does not prove more than one lesion.

Fix: document each lesion's proximal and distal ends, the coronary segments it covers and the stents placed in each. For a bifurcation, document what was done in the main artery and in the side branch.

Missing or duplicated vessel modifier

Vessel identification drives adjudication on every PCI line.

Fix: one modifier per line (LM, LD, LC, RC or RI), no repeats across lines.

Modifier rules

  • LC, LD, RC, RI, LM: required to identify the vessel treated. A missing vessel modifier is one of the most common PCI rejections, and duplicate-vessel modifiers across lines will strip the second line.
  • 59 / XE / XP / XS / XU: used where a genuinely distinct service is performed, most often a diagnostic study that led to the decision to intervene. It must be supported in the note, not applied because the line denied.
  • 22: increased procedural services. Requires a narrative and goes to manual review.
  • 26 / TC: applies in facility settings where the professional and technical components are billed separately.
  • 78 / 79: return to the procedure room during a global period, either for a related complication or for an unrelated procedure.

NCCI bundling edits

  • 92930 with 92928 in the same major artery: one base code per artery, coded to the highest-level intervention.
  • 92930 with the deleted add-on 92929: not reportable for 2026.
  • Angioplasty in the same vessel: included, since the code reads "with coronary angioplasty when performed".
  • Different major arteries in one session: each is separately reportable with its own base code and vessel modifier.
  • Native artery versus bypass graft: work in a native artery can be reported separately from work through a graft.
  • Vascular access, selective catheterization, traversing the lesion, imaging and closure are included in PCI codes.

Frequently asked questions

When should I report 92930 instead of 92928?
When the stenting involved two or more distinct coronary lesions with two or more stents deployed in two or more coronary segments, or a bifurcation lesion requiring angioplasty and/or stenting in both the main artery and the side branch. A single lesion, however long and however many stents it took, is 92928.
Can I report 92930 for several stents in one long lesion?
No. For 2026, 92928 reports stenting of a single lesion regardless of the number of stents or coronary segments. CPT defines a lesion from its proximal end to its distal end, and one lesion may cross several segments. 92930 needs two or more distinct lesions, or a bifurcation treated in both limbs.
Can 92928 and 92930 be billed for the same artery?
No. All work in a major coronary artery and/or its branches is reported with a single code, coded to the highest-level intervention. If a different major artery was treated in the same session, that artery takes its own base code and its own vessel modifier.
Is there an add-on for a stent in a side branch?
No. The additional-branch add-on 92929 was deleted for 2026 and branch work is now part of the base code. A bifurcation treated in both the main artery and the side branch is what 92930 describes.

Sources

American Medical Association, CPT 2026 Professional Edition.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual and quarterly edit tables, cms.gov.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool, cms.gov.
American College of Cardiology, acc.org. AAPC coding resources, aapc.com.

CPT® is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association. Code descriptors are summarised here for billing guidance and are not a substitute for the current CPT codebook. Payer rules and NCCI edits change quarterly; verify against your own payer policy before submission.

Related codes

  • CPT 92928. Coronary stent, one lesion, single major vessel.
  • CPT 92933. Coronary atherectomy with stent, single major vessel.
  • CPT 92945. CTO revascularization, antegrade and retrograde.

Related reading

Are your complex stent cases coded at the right level?

A free Billing X-Ray checks whether multi-lesion and bifurcation cases are being billed as standard stenting, or the reverse.

Book my Billing X-Ray →
πŸ€–Sterling AI AgentOnline Β· instant answers